<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nicole Kidman Not Pregnant For Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spreadit.org/nicole-kidman-not-pregnant-for-now/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spreadit.org/nicole-kidman-not-pregnant-for-now/</link>
	<description>If it's hot,we will spread it.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nicole Kidman Pregnant Yes No Maybe</title>
		<link>http://www.spreadit.org/nicole-kidman-not-pregnant-for-now/#comment-36859</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Kidman Pregnant Yes No Maybe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 01:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spreadit.org/nicole-kidman-not-pregnant-for-now/#comment-36859</guid>
		<description>[...] Sydney earlier today.The Daily Mail is sticking by their story that Nicole is pregnant even though her rep said that the story is incorrect.The New York Post is backing up the idea of a pregnancy by saying: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sydney earlier today.The Daily Mail is sticking by their story that Nicole is pregnant even though her rep said that the story is incorrect.The New York Post is backing up the idea of a pregnancy by saying: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
