Twilight Movie Reviews:Twilight Movie Review
Twilight Movie Reviews:Twilight Movie Review – Twilight Movie Reviews are in and they are not too good,but the reviews for the books were terrible yet,it sold millions.Twilight Movie Reviews are below.
AP:
Reviews don’t always matter to movies, as people will go see many of them even if they have bad writeups. Smaller movies benefit from great reviews and word of mouth, but blockbuster movies don’t need them. Great reviews may have helped with The Dark Knight’s megabucks, but aside from that, if a movie is pegged to make big money, good or bad reviews won’t stop it. That may especially be the case for Twilight, as it stands to be a mega hit although there are no reviews for it just yet.
Entertainment Weekly:
There’s a nifty joke in Robert Benton’s Twilight (Paramount), a meandering, elegiac detective yarn that pretends to be about the relationship between a semiretired gumshoe (Paul Newman) and two veteran movie stars (Gene Hackman and Susan Sarandon) but is actually about the trio of aging stars who play them. At the beginning, Newman’s Harry Ross, a boozing, battle-scarred relic, takes a bullet in the thigh while carrying out a routine assignment (he retrieves a 17-year-old vixen, played by Reese Witherspoon, from a south-of-the-border tryst). Two years later, the rumor circulates that Harry was really shot in the groin — that he’s now a gunslinger without a pistol. Part of the joke is that Harry functions just fine, thank you. What’s even funnier, though, is seeing Paul Newman play a man everyone thinks is no longer virile.
That’s all w have for now on Twilight Movie Reviews:Twilight Movie Review.
Chris | Nov 24, 2008 | Reply
Movie was fantastic!! I would recommend it to all of my family and friends. It was better than the book and the writer pulled a Steven King and made a cameo appearance in the film. Extremely impressive and I give it an A+